- Details
- Written by: Whisky Resource Mark
- Category: Back for the Whisky
- Hits: 408
I don't hide the fact that Glen Scotia is my favourite whisky, it knocked my previous favourite, Glenfarclas, from the top spot when I tried my first whisky from the Kintyre distillery, a 2018 Campbeltown Malt Festival Release, the 2008 Vintage Peated Ruby Port finish. I instantly fell in love, I shared the freshly opened bottle with my brother and distinctly remembered wondering, 'Where did the salt come from?' at that time in my whisky journey, I had not noticed salt in whisky.
Since that day in 2019, I put Glen Scotia as the distillery I most wanted to visit.
Today, I have more bottles of Glen Scotia than from any other distillery. So when in February of this year it was revealed to me that my friend John, his wife and my wife had secretly arranged for me to go with John on a four-night stay in Campbeltown I was over the moon.
The months seemed to tick by slower than normal, but eventually, mid-September was upon us and our 300-mile drive from Tyneside was underway.
We intended to visit the distilleries in Campbeltown and Cadenheads Tasting Room (and other drinking establishments), Glen Scotia was firmly in my mind, so much so, that I booked the dunnage tour months in advance.
On the morning of Tuesday, the 17th of September, we visited Springbank and did the regular tour.
In the afternoon, we did the Glen Scotia Dunnage Tour, costing £55, of which £50 was for the dunnage tasting and £5 for the tour.
The first thing I would like to get out of the way about Glen Scotia is that I was disappointed by the shop. I appreciate it is an old building and space is a premium, rightly assigned to production areas, however, after experiencing what Springbank/Glengyle had to offer the previous morning, especially with 'The Washback Bar', you can't help feeling that maybe a larger shop would be nice. Especially as each time we visited Scotia, it was crowded with visitors, making it difficult to look around. There were also some core range bottles and merchandise out of stock. The latest Icons of Campbeltown release was not available to buy by the time we left, however, it was due to launch on Thursday.
The tour was hosted by Greg. He did a fantastic job guiding us around the site, displaying excellent knowledge of Glen Scotia operations and Campbeltown Whisky history. I am not going to provide any further details of the tour except that it is excellent value and is worth considering the Dunnage tour above the normal tour, you even get to sample some of the new make spirit in the still room.
Once the tour was complete, we finished in the Dunnage warehouse for the tasting.
The following tabs will take you to each whisky we tasted together with my tasting notes:
Filled 2016 - Approx 7/8 Year Old. 60% ABV.
Nose: Fruity and Floral. Caramel Candy Floss (Cotton Candy) and apple. After a while, the brine and maritime character begins to show.
Palate: Apple and floral. Honey, toffee and spice, which includes chilli and black pepper. There is a slight note of salt.
Finish: Honey oak and brine.
With water, the nose shows more of a confectionary note, predominantly caramel. And on the palate, there is more of the Campbeltown Funk of sea salt and maritime notes.
2013 1st Fill Ex-Bourbon then in 2021 reracked into 1st Fill Ex-Oloroso Hogshead. 56.8% ABV
Nose: Rich red fruit with a touch of sulphur. Cardamom, treacle toffee and liquorice root. Slowly raisin and sultana make themselves known with salt appearing at the end.
Palate: Salty and rich dark fruit with bitter spices. Polished wood and treacle toffee. No sulphur could be found on the palate.
Finish: Old oak and spice.
With water, the nose starts to show more of the Campbeltown funk with maritime brine and more spice.
On the palate, the water brings out a dunnage note, and the dark fruits reveal a rich transition to Christmas cake.
2016 8 Year Old 2nd fill Ex- Pedro Ximenez. 59.9% ABV
Nose: Rubber (Sulphur), dark red fruit and red liquorice sticks. Spice and herbs. A musty grape skin. Thankfully the sulphurous note of rubber dissipates very quickly.
Palate: Slightly rubber. Spice-topped fruit pie with cream. Salty caramel with milk chocolate. Lingering vegetal note.
Finish: Oak and chilli pepper.
2001 1st Fill Ex-bourbon then reracked in 2019 into 1st fill Ex-Bordeaux Red Wine 56.1% ABV 22/23 Year Old Approx
Nose: Rich jammy red fruit mainly redcurrant and blackberry. A touch of sulphur. Cardamom and vegetal. A cedar wood note appears at the very end.
Palate: Sweet and dark jammy fruits. Musty with a dry fruit skin note. A touch of sulphur introduces salt. Maple syrup morphs almost into cherry tunes together with the menthol note.
Finish: Oak, spice and lingering cherry menthol.
2016 Heavily Peated Ex-Bourbon (54.8 ppm) 59% ABV.
Nose: Peat with a medicinal almost plasters (bandaid) note. Honey, caramel, cereal and grist. Lemon rind and salt.
Palate: Salty, Lemon and honey drizzle cake. Sweet and Sour sensations, Earthy with a touch of petrichor.
Finish: Salted Oak.
Overall, the whiskies tasted were all sensational, considering they were all technically single cask or at least drawn directly from the final cask, the tour gave you a chance to try some unique tasting opportunities, which, if purchased as part of a tasting pack represent excellent value for money, the location and atmosphere add to the sensation of nose and taste.
My favourite was the 2001 finished in Ex- Ex-Bordeaux Red Wine but that peated that followed was also amazeballs.
A fantastic experience that I look forward to doing again in the future.
- Details
- Written by: Mark
- Category: Back for the Whisky
- Hits: 678
This Inaugural Whisky Blog Post! Announces that this Whisky Blog is hereby called ⬆️ what the image says.
Inaugural bottle releases seem to be a thing.
A deep hunger sweeps over you.
YOU need to get that the first bottle released from 'X' distillery
NO! ITS MORE THAN THAT! YOU NEED, MY PRECIOUS, NOW! Fear of missing out sweeps over you.
At this point we need to take a step back and return to the beginning of the story, except there is no DeLorean or 88mph required...
A group of Friends / Acquaintances / Investors / Family Members / Whoever have a business meeting and discuss their love of whisky / making money / bringing back a lost heritage / whatever the reason.
Their talk turns to
'Hey, why can't we build our own distillery'.
They discuss where it should be - The lost heritage could be the initial idea spark, maybe a disused industrial site or piece of wasteland.
Later on they approach specialists in the industry, discuss the style of whisky they want, draw up an idea.
The idea becomes a proposal, the proposal becomes a business plan, the plan becomes an official application to HMRC, the local authority, Fire, Police, Highways etc
Eventually a distillery is announced, once every thing has been dotted and crossed, planning is granted.
A building constructed, a still, mashtun & all other manner of equipment fitted, a visitor centre created, a website designed promoting the new gleaming producer of our favourite drink. Then it stops (not for the staff, they are still extremely busy and will be for sometime). It stops for the Whisky Enthusiast.
The first wave of excitement was chatter in the air, the rumours of a new distillery.
Then the rumours become fact. You keep track of every milepost phase of the distilleries birth.
Until...
The distillery is operational and open for visits.
You visit the new distillery for the first time. Possibly try the first example of the character the distillery is trying to create, by means of an official blended whisky or possibly a single malt from an unknown distillery. If you are really lucky you get to try some of the new make spirit. But alas, the excitement wains, you now know it's a waiting game.
It's not until the Inaugural bottle is released does the full clamour and frenzy of the whisky enthusiast get up to its full potential. The inaugural bottle is something special, it's the cumulation of at least three years of patience and effort by the distillery team who produce the whisky. They have designed a distillery to produce a specific character, used their expertise to identify the correct cut points and placed the new make into carefully selected barrels nurturing the spirit and allowing it to shine when its ready, while also, gently enhancing its potential with cask influence. Getting hold of the the first official release from the new distillery is the ultimate aim, one that can not under any circumstance be missed.
Once the inaugural release has passed, the distillery will have its hardcore followers who will (Try) buy everything that is released, it will have its flippers who will (try) want to make a quick profit and it will have whisky enthusiasts who will happen upon a bottle, eventually, and realise what a sleeping giant they have discovered.
During the early years a new distillery is growing, trying to re-coup its development costs, they may release Gin, Vodka even Rum. Trying to remain competitive in the marketplace while making as much margin as they can.
So it is a little surprising that many new distilleries haven't yet had many, if any, independent bottles released.
But they are still establishing themselves, stock is low and investment is key, they can't afford to have one of their casks mismanaged and result in a poor bottle and have their name on it. It's a fine balancing act.
But once an independent bottle is released, once again, the whisky enthusiast becomes excited and the flippers do somersaults (and hopefully break a bone or all).
So it's less of a surprise that no SMWS (Scotch Malt Whisky Society) code has been allocated to the shiny new distillery. After all, SMWS will only publicly issue a code once a barrel is ready to be bottled. If they don't have a barrel they won't have a potential code.
Such 'New' Distilleries that don't yet have an SMWS code are:
Annandale
Borders
Dalmunach
Glenwyvis
Isle of Raasay
Lochlea
Nc'Nean
Torabhaig
and the numerous distilleries being built or going online right now.
But how "OLD', is still too new, to not have an SMWS Code?
A little older and possibly surprising are:
Ailsa Bay - William Grant & Son Officially opened in 2009
Daftmill - Family Owned & first distillation was December 2005
Kilkerran - Glengyle Distillery owned by Mitchell's Glengyle Ltd think Springbank, it went online in 2004.
Kininivie - Another Willian Grant & Son Went online in 1990
Wolfburn - Went online 2013
However, the biggest surprise for me was The Speyside Distillery, behind the Spey brand, do not have a SMWS code, when I released this, I searched around the internet looking at all the different sites that provide an SMWS code and sure enough The Speyside Distillery which went operational in 1990 has not had an SMWS bottle released.
Im certain there will be some excitement and fury to get hold of the inaugural SMWS bottle, if it's ever released.
SMWS may well have casks already, of Spey and some of the other distilleries mentioned, only time will tell.
There are other instances where a 'Brand' doesn't have its own code and maybe it should because of precedence.
For example, The Loch Lomond Distillery, possibly the most diverse distillery in Scotland, producing varying styles of whisky from Malt & Grain has several codes for its varying styles:
Croftengea SMWS Code 122
Inchmurrin SMWS Code 112
Inchmoan SMWS Code 135
Loch Lomond Grain SMWS Code G9
Loch Lomond Rhosdhu Grain SMWS Code G15
Loch Lomond aren't alone with this code allocation by SMWS, all coming out of the same distillery we have:
Springbank SMWS Code 27
Hazelburn SMWS Code 126
Longrow SMWS Code 114
However, the following brands appear not to have independent codes:
Ballechin - Edradours Peated Brand. Edradour is code 32, we assume a Peated SMWS Edradour would be code 32.
Cu Bocan.- Tomatins Peated Brand. Tomatin is code 11
Inchfad - Loch Lomond Peated Brand.
Ledaig - Tobermorys Peated Brand. Tobermory is code 42.
Old Ballantruan - Tomintouls Peated Brand. Tomintoul is code 89
It would be great to hear more about how the SMWS decide when to have a cask code or is the decision up to the distillery themselves? Given the code is supposed to be secret, a way for whisky enthusiasts to explore whisky simply based on flavour profiles and whisky styles, maybe we may never know.
The full list of Whisky Brands and their codes or lack thereof can be found by the link below.
Scottish Distilleries and SMWS Codes (or Not)
- Details
- Written by: Malty
- Category: Back for the Whisky
- Hits: 571
Reviewing & Scoring Whisky
How the Whisky Value & Transparency Score (WVTS) came to be
Scoring Whisky (My Ramblings)
There are many whisky reviewers. They can be found on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube.
Some have their own blog. I will add links to some of my favourites in due course.
Most, not all of course, of the reviewers will score a whisky according to their own tastes, this is usually a number, some like Stuart (Whisky Whims) has a binary score system with either a "Win or a Bin", others score out of 5, a fair few out of 10 and then the remainder out of 100.
When I was conceptualising my whisky review channel and the original WhiskyResource website, I wanted to do something different, something unique, to take away perception, subjectivity or personal bias.
I wanted to give my own rating to a whisky, I considered out of 10, however, I didn't want to give decimal places, which, you could always run the risk of doing, you have two whiskies which are so similar, you previously gave one of them an 8, the second one is better than the 8, but its not quite a 9, but you want to score it better than the 8, so you give it 8.1... before you know it, you are looking at 8.15, 8.2 etc.
For a while and you will see this on my YouTube reviews, I decided to score out of 100.
However I was never happy with scoring a whisky. You see when reviewing whisky, there are many factors to consider:
Is it a new bottle and are you reviewing the first pour?
Or is the bottle down to the label? or past halfway? What impact has an open bottle had on the experience?
Is it a sample? and was the sample the first pour or last pour, how long was the bottle open before a sample was taken.
When did you last eat? and what did you have?
What is your emotional state? what is your mood like? are you tired?
I could go on.
Many whisky enthusiasts will agree a whisky can change, even within minutes of pouring it into the glass, some take moments, others longer. Some whiskies will start to change once the bottle is open. YOU even change, they say your taste preferences change roughly every seven (7) years.
Each of these factors mean that how you score a whisky could be different to how you would have scored it yesterday or in a years time.
Whisky scoring is very subjective, it is a score based on your own palate and your preferences in that moment.
But because it is subjective, it will mean some people will agree with you and others will disagree, often with some passion.
So as I was saying, before I started to waffle, I wanted something unique, a way for a whisky to be scored and have all subjectivity removed, a way to look at a whisky and its key attributes. To have a score which would work for all whisky using the same fact based calculation with no subjectivity.
So I devised a value score, based out of 100, it takes the key whisky facts into consideration.
What the score cannot tell you is if the whisky is any good, as I state, this is very subjective and depends on an individuals taste, as such, it is important to take several reviewers points of view into account, before making up your mind about buying a whisky.
How is the Value Score calculated?
The Value Score looks at the following (Published Statements from the producer)
- The Price of a whisky - Always stated
- The Age - Often stated unless it is a Non Age Statement.
- The ABV (Alcohol by volume) - Aways stated
- Chill Filtration - Has it been chill filtered or not - This is not always stated.
- Natural Colour - Is it natural colour or been adjusted - This is not always stated.
- Cask Strength*- Is is cask strength or not - This is not always stated but how about Batch Strength?
- Single Cask* - Is the whisky single cask or not - This is not always stated & isn't a well defined description.
The calculation begins with the maximum score of 100.
100 is our ceiling value, while it is possible for a whisky to score above 100, this is very rare and with whisky pricing increasing over recent times, getting more unlikely to occur.
Example calculation based on a whisky which is:
£50
10 Year Old
43% ABV
Chill Filtered
Colour Adjusted
Not cask or batch strength and not single cask.
We look at the price and calculate the price per year (Age).
So a 10 year old whisky costing £50 would be calculated as 50/10 = 5
We subtract 5 (calculated above) from the starting 100 so 100-5 = 95
Next we look at the ABV, since a whisky is typically non chill filtered at 46% or above, we use 46% as the base point, for every % ABV below we deduct a point and for every % above to a max of 50% we give a point.
With our example whisky it is 43%, so we deduct 3 points 95-3 = 92
Next we look at chill filtration, this is a YES/NO/UNKNOWN answer
Yes we deduct 6 points
No looses no points
Unknown we deduct 6 points (We like transparency and push distilleries to be open)
In the example the whisky IS chill filtered and also colour adjusted.
So we take 92 from the previous calculation above and deduct a further 6 for chill filtration, therefore
92-6 = 86
Finally we look at colour, since this one is coloured we remove another 2 points - While colour isn't necessarily a bad thing, there are some people who believe they can taste the caramel colour, and while rare, there are some people who are intolerant (Alergic) to caramel colour - In the UK there is no legal requirement to state the whisky has been coloured - It is an accepted process that allows distilleries to keep batches of whisky consistent, having the same colour profile assists with this. But we think it is unnecessary.
So 86-2 = 84
The value score is 84
Another example,
£50
10 Year Old
48% ABV
Non Chill Filtered
Natural Colour
Not cask or batch strength and not single cask.
The Calculation would be
50/10 = 5 (Cost per year)
100 - 5 = 95
95 + 2 = 97 (2 added for an ABV above 46%)
97-0 (No adjustment for Chill Filtration as it HASN'T been filtered)
97-0 (No Adjustment for Colour as it is natural with no added Caramel)
Final Score 97.
When we compare the two whiskies, they are at the same price, same age, one is naturally presented but is 5% ABV higher. However the former scores 84 points and the latter 97 points.
The better presented whisky is better value and the score reflects this.
FINALLY
We give an additional point if it is cask (batch) strength and an additional point if it is Single Cask.
In the example of the second bottle, if this were the case it would have scored 99 points as it is a completely naturally presented whisky exactly as it came from the cask with no adjustments made.
A whisky can achieve a value score of 100 for this to be achieved the whisky needs to be bottled above 50% ABV, have a price per year of less than £6 and be completely naturally presented.
Achieving a value score of 100 does happen, however, it is quite rare.
*Cask Strength - This includes batch strength.
*Single Cask - We use the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) definition which is that a whisky must remain in only one cask for its maturation to qualifying as Single Cask.
Should all of this leave you confused, then using magic and some programming skills, I have added a Value Score Calculator to the site, you can access it here Value Score Calculator (link new window)
Value Scores of -1, 0 and 101
Occasionally you will see me mention a value score which is -1 or 0 or 101, this is an explanation of those
-1 (minus one) value score are whiskies that are not necessarily rare, they do not achieve all 4 (four) presentation attributes of Non Chill Filtered, Natural Colour, Single Cask and Cask Strength. Simply put, they are just very expensive and do not reflect value for money. An example would be a 25 Year Old Whisky that is bottled at 43% chill filtered, coloured but not single cask nor cask strength with a retail price of £2,225, the value score would be calculated as exactly 0 (zero), any whisky with a calculated score below 0.5 would be assigned the -1 (minus one) value score. The whisky could be any combination of the 4 whisky attributes to still achieve -1 value score, it is calculated on the individual whisky specifics.
0 (zero) value score are those whiskies which we either do not have a historical/current price or due to our error no value score has been assigned. We look to re-evaluate each whisky as we update the database listing.
101 Diamond (one hundred and one) value score whiskies are those which are very rare or limited. An example would be this whisky:
Glen Scotia 48 Year Old Single Malt Whisky
It is a very old and limited whisky, bottled with all 4 (four) key whisky attributes - non chill filtered, natural colour, cask strength and single cask, however since the price is prohibitively expensive, a value score between 1 and 100 cannot be assigned but it would be unfair to assign a -1 score due to its rarity and natural presentation.
This does not mean it is good value, since value cannot be assigned to such a whisky due to its rarity.
If you are interested, the calculated score would be -133.16 (minus one hundred & thirty three), at this level the information becomes meaningless and no longer serves any useful purpose.